Comfyui vs a1111. 1 Setting up both UI Versions; 2.

Comfyui vs a1111 It's a matter of using different things like ControlNet, regional prompting, IP-Adapters, IC-Light, so on and so forth, together to create interesting images that you like. Thank you so much for reading 💖 Like | Follow | Subscribe to the newsletter. While both tools serve similar purposes, they differ in Automatic1111 WebUI is terrific for simple image generation, retouching images (inpainting), and basic controls. . Reply reply #stablediffusionart #stablediffusion #stablediffusionai In this Video I have compared Automatic1111 and ComfyUI with different samplers and Different Steps. Hi guys quick question. A lot of it already exists in A1111. So from that aspect, they'll never give the same results unless you set A1111 to use the CPU for the seed. Only arguments I used in A1111 were --xformers. Introduction; testing UI Stability 2. I've tried to wrap my head around the paper and checked A1111 repository to find any clues, . 2 Testing Different Sampling Methods; 2. 5 seconds to perform one iteration, therefore ComfyUI is slower. E. Does comfyui working similar way and giving me boost against a1111? A1111 expected me know what a VAE was without giving me any context. I was tested on A1111 and comfyui to produce similar image before. So it is also a personal choice at this point. I tried Compare ComfyUI vs a1111-nevysha-comfy-ui and see what are their differences. You probably applied prompt weighting same as A1111. g. yaml. The different depands on your prompt length. (by comfyanonymous) stable-diffusion Pytorch. What I would like to do is just simply replicate the Restart sampler from A1111 in ComfyUI (to start with). if I need a few ideas. Because SD does not really work well without a text prompt, the results are usually quite prompt: light summer dress, realistic portrait photo of a young man with blonde hair, hair roots slightly faded, russian, light freckles(0. 2) and just gives weird results. If your prompt get longer, the different comes more. Do they always produce the same image? The answer is no. On my 12GB 3060, A1111 can't generate a single SDXL 1024x1024 image without using RAM for VRAM at some point near the end of generation, even with --medvram set. 70it/s. This document presents some old and new workflows for promptless inpaiting in Automatic1111 and ComfyUI and compares them in various scenarios. 2 Invoke AI; 3. Source Code. This is primarily due to two key factors: noise A1111 and ComfyUI would produce different results after 75 clip's limit. invoke has a cleaner UI compared to A1111, and while thats superficial, when demonstrating or explaining concepts to others, A1111 can be daunting to the uninitiated. I found ComfyUI_restart_sampling custom node, but it's a bit more complicated. Please share your tips, tricks, and workflows for using this software to create A1111’s Approach. 1 Comparing Sampling Steps; 3. A1111 tends to have a very weak effect of prompts compared to ComfyUI, so you must have given strong weighting to match it. I really like the extensions library and ecosystem that already exists around A1111- in particular stuff like 'OneButtonPrompt' which is great for inspiration on styles, etc. With ComfyUI you just download the portable zip file, unzip it and get ComfyUI running instantly, even a kid can get ComfyUI installed. How to link Stable Diffusion Models Between ComfyUI and A1111 or Other Stable Diffusion AI image generator WebUI? Whether you are using a third-party installation package or the official integrated package, you can find the extra_model_paths. Methods overview "Naive" inpaint: The most basic workflow just masks an area and generates new content for it. Comparing UI Stability: Automatic1111 Vs ComfyUI Table of Contents. I want to switch from a1111 to comfyui. Among other things this gives you the While ComfyUI can help with complicated things that would be a hassle to use with A1111, it won't make your images non-bland. I have 1060 with 6gb ram. sd-webui-comfyui is an extension for A1111 webui that embeds ComfyUI workflows in different sections of the normal pipeline of the webui. Can't wait until the A1111 comfyui extension is able to include txt2img and img2img as nodes via api. It’s more beginner-friendly. Gradio caused no vulnerability. I used A1111 for a long time, but when I started using ComfyUI - I can't really go back at this point, it feels too "stuffy" there. haven't had much luck with a1111 with sdxl. A1111 generates an image with the same settings (in spoilers) in 41 seconds, and ComfyUI in 54 seconds. After more testing, I had found that after 75 characters in the prompt which also the clip limit. It lacks some features of A1111, but it is much easier to install and use, and it has a A1111 sketch was quite buggy too but in Forge when sketching on a bigger image the mouse would disappear after drawing a line and only appear a few seconds later so you can draw the next line which is quite annoying. 0 on my RTX 2060 laptop 6gb vram on both A1111 and ComfyUI the A1111 took forever to generate an image without refiner the UI was very laggy I did remove all the extensions but nothing really change so the image always stocked on 98% I don't know why. Both are built on the foundation of Stable Diffusion, a When using ComfyUI and Automatic1111 WebUI (A1111), you might notice that even with the same seed value, the generated images differ. Usage: python3 comfyui_a1111_prompt_array_generator. Thank you so much, that did help a great deal. A1111 almost as same as ComfyUI base only. com/file/d/1iUPtXtAUilKc7 I've moved from A1111 to ComfyUI, but one thing I'm really missing is the Restart sampler found in A1111. 2 Impact of Streaming/Recording Software; i started with invokeai, but have mostly moved to A1111 because of the plugins as well as a lot of youtube video instructions specifically referencing features in A1111. I haven't found easy methods to replicate stuff like that in This is why ComfyUI is the BEST UI for Stable Diffusion#### Links from the Video ####Olivio ComfyUI Workflows: https://drive. They had discoverable unique IDs on a proxy, provided graciously for your convenience, which led to an expectation-of-privacy issue, not an authentication or authorization Automatic1111 is great, but the one that impressed me, in doing things that Automatic1111 can't, is ComfyUI. I had to reinstall it so many times and watch so many YT videos dedicated to A1111 issues. In this article, we will be comparing the speed and performance of Comfy UI, Automatic 1111, and Invoke AI. Tested failed loras with a1111 they were great. I love A1111, but there is a huge misconception somewhere in the app that author should look into. The path is as follows: a1111 is IOS 13 and comfyui is Android 9. example file in the corresponding ComfyUI installation directory. It's obvious that a VAE is used to encode and decode an image because I can see it in the flow. Long story short i noticed either my comfyui or lora settings are not compatible or something. Generates noise on the GPU; May have slight variations across different hardware; Produces fundamentally different noise patterns from ComfyUI; Performance Impact. A quality/performance comparison of the Fooocus image generation software vs Automatic1111 and ComfyUI. 3 Analyzing Results; Checking Speed Performance 3. While ComfyUI has a steeper learning curve, more advanced users will be able to design powerful workflows, especially when leveraging the rich custom node ecosystem. google. works great for 1. 3 Comfy UI; SD Next vs Automatic 1111; Conclusion; FAQ; Article Introduction. Edit #1: I think I get what happened to me. It would ask me for a number of steps, and a scheduler, but not tell me what they controlled. When convert to ComfyUI, you should lower the weighting. ComfyUI Some interest findings of A1111 and comfyui. The weights are also interpreted differently. I read that Forge increses speed for my gpu by 70%. Asked reddit wtf is going on everyone blindly copy pasted the same thing over and over. Its image compostion capabilities allow you to assign different prompts and weights, even using different models, to specific areas of an image. I have been watching videos on InbokeAI for the last couple of weeks, and it seems to be overall a much more polished version of Automatic1111, which much better inpainting and outpainting, however, it seems to lack X/Y plot which I use pretty much every time to compare results between models, and I heard it might not be compatible with every model out there. I still find A1111 to be better suited for working with just one image, though, while ComfyUI is for batches (especially complicated workflows). It also seems like ComfyUI is way too intense on using heavier weights on (words:1. If you just want to make images and see results quickly then Automatic1111 is the best choice. json to ComfyUI Advanced usage: Use CTRL+Drag to select multiple While ComfyUI and A1111 have their strengths, Forge emerged as the best choice for me. Reply reply More replies Top 1% Rank by size SDXL 1. Also ComfyUI takes up more VRAM (6400 MB in ComfyUI and 4200 MB in A1111). CUI can AUTOMATIC1111 (often shortened to A1111) and ComfyUI are two popular open source web UIs for Stable Diffusion. Both allow you to interactively develop image generation pipelines, so which one should you use? Mostly the way words (tokens) in your prompt are interpreted (CLIP encoders). Welcome to the unofficial ComfyUI subreddit. 0 A1111 vs ComfyUI 6gb vram, thoughts . But it is not the final answer. AUTOMATIC1111. Whether you choose A1111 or ComfyUI, both tools are powerful allies in the quest for stunning AI-generated imagery. A1111 is REALLY unstable compared to ComfyUI. 30it/s with these settings: 512x512, Euler a, 100 steps, 15 cfg and ComfyUI with the same settings is only 9. A1111 made machines vulnerable by allowing people to save images wherever they likes, and also loading images from specific locations as code. And don't forget embedding: prefix for embeddings. Because of its strong momentum and pace of development, it’s There is a fair amount of tutorials available over the Internet, have a large choice of extensions of which I haven't always found an equivalent on ComfyUI (extensions for A1111 and ComfyUI are not compatible), have a more friendly user interface (though it takes some time to find which parameters are the most sensitive), and provides IMHO Why? its very simple, A1111 is performing 7 iterations in one second, comfyUI is taking 1. Its user-friendly interface, robust performance, and comprehensive documentation make it a pleasure to use. That means you can use every extension, setting In the realm of AI-driven image generation, two prominent interfaces have emerged: Automatic1111 and ComfyUI. A1111 breaks a lot and its so annoying to fix it. 5 though. 2), brown eyes, no makeup, instagram, around him are other people playing volleyball, intricate, highly With the latest update to ComfyUI it is now possible to use the AdvancedClipEncode node which gives you control over how you want prompt weights interpreted and normalized. 1 Setting up both UI Versions; 2. I changed card and should have reinstalled a1111. That's why new fresh forgeUi made so A1111 gives me 10. Discussion I did try using SDXL 1. For a I am a big fan of both A1111 and ComfyUI. For instance (word:1. On the other hand, ComfyUI is more performant and A1111 is more like a sturdy but highly adaptable workbench for image generation. 1 Automatic 1111; 3. “(Composition) will be different between comfyui and a1111 due to various reasons”. This allows to create ComfyUI nodes that interact directly with some parts of the webui's normal pipeline. No performance difference between CPU and GPU noise generation; Each approach has its benefits, with ComfyUI prioritizing consistency; Prompt Weight Handling Hello! Looking to dive into animatediff and am looking to learn from the mistakes of those that walked the path before me🫡🙌🫡🙌🫡🙌🫡🙌 Are people using Ultimate Speed Test: ComfyUi vs Invoke ai vs Automatic1111 Table of Contents. ComfyUI also uses xformers by default, which is non-deterministic. ComfyUI uses the CPU for seeding, A1111 uses the GPU. In ComfyUI I can see what each parameter applies to. Reply reply oO0_ • if you dislike slow, full of megabytes of java script web pages, and dont like to make 5 clicks (like in yt to switch language) where 2 is enough - install ComfyUI and forgot 1111 as unlucky prompt. ComfyUI. You don't need to switch to one or the other. ComfyUI vs Automatic1111 (A1111) ComfyUI and Automatic1111 (sometimes also called A1111 or stable-diffusion-webui) are the two most popular Stable Diffusion UIs, and they both have their strengths and weaknesses. some days I would get lucky with 1024by1024, some days even 1024 by 1024 won't work. 1) in Here's a comparison chart between ComfyUI, A1111 (Stable Diffusion Web UI), and Forge, highlighting key features, strengths, and considerations: Feature ComfyUI Automatic1111 vs ComfyUI: What's the Key Differences? Both Automatic1111 and ComfyUI are tools for creating AI-generated artwork. The most powerful and modular diffusion model GUI, api and backend with a graph/nodes interface. py <steps> [step_start inclusive (default:0)] [step_end exclusive (default:max)] Load the newly generated workflow. Introduction; Test Setup; Performance Comparison 3. The big current advantage of ComfyUI over Automatic1111 is it appears to handle VRAM much better. shrkyt ahj wbdh jzy puyuv gmhfp twdg rynw jyeo cial