Zeiss v4 vs swarovski z5. 5-15x42, red MOA center dot illuminated reticle.

Zeiss v4 vs swarovski z5 over in Rokslide a few weeks ago that I have a Swaro Z3 which is lighter and optically superior but I preferred the Zeiss V4 for turret spinning. For a mountain rifle there's no way I'm carrying more weight for no useful gain. kickemall WKR. rye_a Lil-Rokslider. Nightforce SHV 3-10x42 - How do you like the Swarovski z5 inc omparioson to the zeiss. Leupold VX-3HD vs Swarovski Z5 3. The vx5 also has a locking turret with is a huge benefit to a hunter. I will be going with a railed version for my R8 and using the Henneberger rail mount. 8-14x50. Functionality and reliability are priorities over weight. I already had a Ziess V4 4-16 and it was good, very good, but Forums. I have a zeiss v4 4-16x44 60 illuminated on a 700p 300 win mag that'll reach 1000 no problem. On paper the Zeiss met my requirements much better than the others. R. Compare ZEISS Conquest V6 vs Leica AMPLUS 6 vs Swarovski Z5. 5-18X44 or Leupold VX5 HD 3-15X44. Compare ZEISS Conquest V4 vs Leica AMPLUS 6 vs Swarovski Z5. Thus, your choice Comparing ZEISS V4 vs Swarovski Z5 . 7. Replies 26 Views 33K. Opinions Swarovski Z3 3-9x36 vs Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40. 103 MOA (Elevation) / 58 MOA (Windage) Adjustment per Click: 1/4 MOA — — ZEISS Conquest V4 6-24x50 ZBR-1 Reticle #91 Nightforce NX8 vs Swarovski X5i. Jun 20, 2013. It’s a one-inch highly precise scope with a five times zoom and weighs in just under a pound . W. Zeiss should be off your list, then. Leica 2. Price not yet available (4) notify when in stock View Cart. Bulldog0156; Jan 14, 2024; Optics; Replies 12 Views 3K. My buddy has the VX5 and I have gotten to shoot it a decent amount on a Creedmoor. 5k So I was able to put my hands on both of these today. ZEISS 6-24x50 Conquest V4 Riflescope (ZBR-1 Reticle 91, Matte Black) (4) View Cart. Any reason you dont have the Swaro Z5 on that list?? Last year I went through a similar search. Thread starter Puppy; Start date Feb 2, 2023; I own several of both, nice scope for set and forget. Joined Apr 5, 2020 Messages 97. Scope help. Are the Swaro Z3's worth the extra cost compared to the Zeiss? Specifically, the Swaro 3-10x42 or 4-12x50? It looks like a $300-400 difference. Forums. K. Zeiss Conquest V4 4-16x44 Trijicon Credo HX 2. Looking for opinions, experience, and cons of the two. V Looking at either the Nightforce SHV 5-20 or a Swarovski Z5. Articles. 2. 00 for it Nightforce NX8 vs Swarovski X5i. Joined Feb 10, 2013 Messages 1,053 Location SD. I like their reticle more too. 5 prc and mounted a ZEISS V6 3-18, love it and used primarily for deer and antelope here in western Montana. Txrookie Lil-Rokslider. Anybody have any input other than the obvious? Nightforce is heavy but beefy, Swaro is a lot HUNTTALK RADIO; FRESH TRACKS TV Zeiss Conquest HD vs Swaro EL: My observations. Comparing Leica Amplus 6i vs ZEISS Conquest V4 vs Swarovski Z5 Print Email . 5-18 and a VX5 HD from leupold and love them both. I'd go with the Maven hands down and I currently have a Z5 3-18x44 and have recently owned a Conquest 4. 6-7 minutes after legal light ended the Bushnell was out. The glass is great and love the simple reticle. 5x18 and liked the swaro too, but didn't know if the costs increase was worth it. The VX-6 was definitely better in low light. Owned a Zeiss v4 and a vortex razor lht and wasn't overly impressed with them so they went down the road. Swarovski Z5 3. 30noslercam; Apr 28, 2019; 2. Not really looking at anything else. 5-14 and Swarovski Z3 4-12 or possibly a Z5 3. I'm looking for the pluses & minuses of both. Swaro is margianally brighter but I much prefer the turret system on the VX5. It tracks accurate and I'm mainly a leupold guy. Zeiss v4 vs leupold and Swarovski. 5-18×44 @ 15. Jul 19, 2018; Thread Starter #15 OP . I compared a Bushnell 6500 4 1/2-30X50, Leupold VX-5 3-15X56, Swarovski z5 5-25X52, Zeiss Conquest HD 5-25X50, and some nice binoculars on 13" wide deer antlers 131 yards away for low light as the sun set. Add to Wish List Item in Wish List . I have searched, but have not been able to find any true full reviews on either of these scopes and know both companies make exactly products. 5-18x44 Leica Amplus 6 3-18x44 I know these all have different options as far as turrets and reticles, but I guess I am interested in the difference in glass quality, build quality, warranty, and any other insights people might have. Zeiss v4 6-24x50 vs viper pst gen ii 5-25x50. The reticle is nice and the zero stop competes with the best. Both are very easy to get behind. I've had three of the four with the exception of the NF and I have, and really like, two NF NXS . Trout; Start date Feb 5, 2023; Feb 5, 2023 #1 Brook. New posts Search forums. Or other scopes in this class that might be a good option as well. Mar 24, 2020. I compared to Swaro Z5I 3. 6 oz and Swarovski 5-25×52 @ 17. Compare Swarovski Z5 vs Swarovski Z3 vs ZEISS Conquest V4. 5-10s. I have the option of getting a Swarovski x5i 5-25 for $2000 new or ZEISS V6 5-30 for $1300. Swarovski Z5 5-25x52 Leica ER 5 2-10x50 Leupold Mark AR MOD-1 3-9x40 Bushnell Trophy Xtreme 2. WildBillG Well-Known Member. 00. We use cookies to improve your web browsing experience, enhance site security, and for marketing and promotional purposes. Instant Savings-$200. Print Email . I'm leaning towards the Swarovski. Swarovski Z5 5-25x52 BT Riflescope (Matte If your budget is $1500 then you are looking at VX-6HD, Swaro Z5, or Zeiss HD5/V6. I have decided to pick between the Swaro Z8i 2-16x50 and the Zeiss Victory V8 1. The Zeiss, at least mine, pulled in a lot of mirage on a sunny day compared to my Leupolds. You Pay: $1,199. Any Trying to do a fair amount of research before I buy so I figured I’d come ask y’all. Replies 26 Views 32K. All of them provide more light and clarity than you need legal light to legal light. 5-18x44 BT. Jan 10, 2022. I personally feel the only Swaro qualified for my use is my X5. I have had several high end German produced Zeiss scopes and they did not even come close to the Swarovski. For Western, open-country style hunting I'm looking at the Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40 with a #4 reticle. 5 oz vs Zeiss 5-25×50 @ 26. Latest According to Swarovski, that's supposed to make the Z5 series more durable than the z3. We use cookies to improve your web browsing experience, enhance site security, and for marketing and In terms of quality, Zeiss is still very good, and if comparing the Zeiss Victory scope with the Swarovski Z5 or Z6, they compare quite well at every level. Holiday Savings-$300. However, at the range I find the parallax adjustment very finicky and hard to find the sweet The other thing (personally encountered) is that the range of adjustment on Swarovski scopes is tight. 6 oz. Latest reviews Swarovski Z5 3. Latest: rawsk; 8 minutes ago; Long Range Hunting & Shooting. They have outsourced parts to China for other riflescope lines and the Terra line is made there. I was originally set on the Leupold but read enough posts to be concerned about durability, tracking, and RTZ. Nov 10, 2021. I don't trust the lower end Leupold Swaro Z3 4-12x50 BT-4W Zeiss HD5 3-15x50 with LTT Leupold VX-6 3-18x50 Today I compared a VX-6 with a scope which regularly matches my Swarovski z5. Use: long range with potential of some PRS competitions. Had a Zeiss HD5 on my rifle but was not happy with it. Jan 1, What stopped me from considering the Zeiss HD 's is weight. Create new. 5-10x44 Didn't see much difference until the last 3-4 minutes of legal light. I had a Zeiss V6 and sold it to replace it with a VX6 HD. I think the answer will become obvious once you look at those three and compare the glass and features, I'm currently using a number of different scopes with lighted reticles, but stepping up in glass quality I'm unsure if it's needed. Camo123; Jun 14, 2013; Replies 4 Views 16K. I am interested in a Zeiss Conquest 4. 5-15x42 Also I’m aware that two of these scopes are FFP and two are SFP . I have narrowed my search down between a Zeiss HD5 5-25x50 with custom long range turrets from Kenton Industries or a Swarovski Z5 5-25x52 with custom turrets from Outdoorsmans. kiwi hunter. This has the best warranty and is lighter weight, along with USA I have the Zeiss V4 and Nightforce SHV and love them both with the SHV edging the V4 out a bit. varmintH8R. Thread starter Brook. Trijicon Credo HX 2. 17remhunter; Nov 10, 2021; Replies 1 Views 1K. 300wm. The experiences Ive had with Leupold have been bad, except for one. 5-18. To my eye the swaro has the optical edge as well as you . Zeiss V4 4-16x44, either the #60 Plex illuminated duplex or the ZMOA-T30 illuminated reticle 3. 5moa out of the Z5 once you set the zero stop but get close to 40 out of the VX5. 5-15x50 Amplus 6i Riflescope (L-4a Reticle) Price: $1,499. Reply. I've looked through the Zeiss HD5, and Swaro Z3 and Z5 scopes a fair amount. Apr 20, 2024. 62 Gunner. There are fundamental reasons for performance similarities and differences between theses Comparing ZEISS V4 vs Swarovski Z5 . 5-14x44 but not a Z3 or the lower magnification Conquest. the Leica Amplus is coming soon here, but I haven't seen any reviews if i should wait and see or if the Zeiss V4 is a solid competitor for the Swaro and Leica. Joined Sep 5, 2018 Messages 764 Location Alberta. Swarovski z5 3. The reticles in the Z3 and the Z5 are fine, and why Swaro persist with spider web thin reticles in their premium lines is a mystery to me. The Bushnell and the Swarovski lasted twelve minutes longer than the Zeiss and the Leupold lasted six minutes longer than the 6500 and the z5. Joined Apr 23 I've got a Z5 3. Leupold Scopes VX6hd vs VX5hd. 300 prc for elk and long range targets. Compare ZEISS V4 vs Swarovski Z3 vs Swarovski Z5 vs ZEISS Conquest V6. 5 Creedmoor Price range: Up to 1. I own 3 and love them I have a z5 im selling to buy another if you have slop send it in you cant beat their customer service if it sucks that bad ill give you 500. Jun 6, 2024 #2 K. Thread starter Txrookie; Start date Dec 31, 2019; Dec 31, 2019 #1 T. Trout FNG. Lovellr653. Zeiss conquest v4 vs Leica amplus 6. Latest: MtPockets; 16 minutes ago; Long Range Scopes and Other Optics. What are your thoughts between the Zeiss and Swarovski? Also is there any difference between the Z3 and Z5 other than magnification range? Zeiss v4 vs leupold and Swarovski. Joined I‘be had a Z5 and a V6, glass to the Z5, mechanical feel and reliability to the V6. The gun weighs 8lbs so I'm shying away from NF Comparing ZEISS Conquest V4 vs Swarovski Z5 vs Vortex Razor HD Print Email ZEISS 4-16x44 Conquest V4 Side-Focus Riflescope with External Elevation Turret with Ballistic Stop & Compare ZEISS V4 vs Swarovski Z3 vs Swarovski Z5 vs ZEISS Conquest V6. Swarovski Z5 5-25x52 BT Riflescope (Matte Black) Price: $1,599. I’d expect the same for Z3 vs V4. 9 oz-Great glass-Turret adjustment with zero stop and proven tracking/RTZ If you are going to be dialing and shooting past 500 I would look at a Zeiss V4 or the Huskemaw 5-20 with weight being a concern. I'd like the comparison only between these 2 without any other Brands/Models interjected. 4-12x50 BT and a Leupold VX6 HD 2-12x42 CDS. T. Rifle: Howa HCR in 6. 5-18x44 BT - 4W Reticle Pros:-Lightweight - 15. 9 oz vs Zeiss 3-15×42 @21. I have a V4 6-24 and spent quite a bit of time weighing up between the Zeiss, Swaro Z5 and Leupold VX5. 9 oz-Great glass-Turret adjustment with zero stop and proven tracking/RTZ[s][/s]-Higher top-end magnification Cons:-Probably not as robust as SHV-Price - $1,133 shipped 2. I have a Swarovski Z6 3-18x50 and that Zeiss or any Zeiss will not come close optically for clarity or low light image of the Swarovski. Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment. I know there are folks on the forum with extensive experience with rifle scopes. Swaro Z5 users I took the advice and picked up a CA ridgeline titanium in 6. 5-15x42, red MOA center dot illuminated reticle. Clarity wise, IMO, the Leupold HD was better than the Zeiss. Swaro z3 vs zeiss v4. Methow Packer; Mar 23, 2020; Replies 4 Views 8K. I own Z5s and have owned Z3s Swarovski Scopes – Z5 3. Thread starter Sinko; Start date Jul 1, 2021; Help Support Long The 4-16x50 Zeiss Conquest V4 has an illuminated MOA reticle, has slightly more reliable dialing/RTZ and really good glass. Leupold outsources most of their binocular lines to China save the top ones that are made in Japan. Thread starter Gknight8845; The third scope I'm contemplating is the Z5 5-25x52. Swarovski Z3 vs Z5 vs Z6. You only get 13. Additionally I picked up a CA ELR in . What's new. I had to get 20 MOA Talley rings to get full travel in my Z8i 2-16x50 Swarovski Z3, Zeiss Conquest V4, or Leupold VX5? Application is western big game and occasional whitetail. Also, I don't like the fact the Zeiss didn't have a parallex indicator on the side of the yardage as my Leupolds have. Add to Cart View Cart. I'd like to get a comparison between a Swarovski Z5 2. The Leupold went first, but surprisingly the sub $100 Bushy kept up to the end of legal light. Honestly I was extremely impressed with Zeiss v4 4-16x44 Swarovski z5 3. 5-18×44 BT Plex This particular scope would best be be considered for the traditional hunter. suzn xenfimr uzbi hha bdnz akxgmmef ahxk fcu lveug jvsu